IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v119y2022pe2108590119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hamilton’s rule in economic decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Moshe Levy

    (a School of Business, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91905, Israel;)

  • Andrew W. Lo

    (b MIT Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142)

Abstract

Kin selection—helping genetically related individuals even at a cost to oneself—can be evolutionarily advantageous. This is the main theoretical explanation for altruism in the natural world. Hamilton’s rule provides a simple algebraic relationship that captures this profound idea. While behavior consistent with Hamilton’s rule has been observed in many species, a direct and sharp test of this rule has not yet been performed. In this paper, we employ techniques borrowed from experimental economics to test the predictions of Hamilton’s rule. We find strong support for the rule. This result sheds light on the dominant role played by evolutionary biology in explaining human behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Moshe Levy & Andrew W. Lo, 2022. "Hamilton’s rule in economic decision-making," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119(16), pages 2108590119-, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:119:y:2022:p:e2108590119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/119/16/e2108590119.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Flüter-Hoffmann, Christiane & Traub, Patricia, 2023. "Menschen mit Behinderungen im Homeoffice: Erleichterung für die Inklusion? Eine Gegenüberstellung von Deutschland und einigen angelsächsischen Ländern," IW-Reports 10/2023, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    2. Moshe Levy, 2022. "An evolutionary explanation of the Allais paradox," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1545-1574, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:119:y:2022:p:e2108590119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.