IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v118y2021pe2108507118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frequency of enforcement is more important than the severity of punishment in reducing violation behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Kinneret Teodorescu

    (a Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 3200003, Israel;)

  • Ori Plonsky

    (a Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 3200003, Israel;)

  • Shahar Ayal

    (b School of Psychology, Reichman University (IDC), Herzliya 4610101, Israel;)

  • Rachel Barkan

    (c Department of Business Administration, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel)

Abstract

Ramifications of seemingly small violations, such as not adhering to COVID-19 regulations, accumulate fast with dire social consequences. The high costs of close monitoring and severe sanctions often lead policymakers to prioritize either the probability of inspection or the severity of punishments. Using common one-shot, descriptive settings, findings from experimental economics support the superiority of severe punishments, whereas findings from behavioral ethics highlight the role of internal rather than external enforcement. However, these settings are estranged from real-life environments in which learning about the external enforcement policy naturally occurs via repeated experience. Using a more ecologically valid, experience-based setting, we found robust evidence for the greater effectiveness of frequent small punishments over rare severe punishments in reducing violations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kinneret Teodorescu & Ori Plonsky & Shahar Ayal & Rachel Barkan, 2021. "Frequency of enforcement is more important than the severity of punishment in reducing violation behaviors," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118(42), pages 2108507118-, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:118:y:2021:p:e2108507118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/118/42/e2108507118.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:17:y:2022:i:3:p:513-546 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Garston Liang & Tim Rakow & Eldad Yechiam & Ben R. Newell, 2022. "The day after the disaster: Risk-taking following large- and small-scale disasters in a microworld," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 17(3), pages 513-546, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:118:y:2021:p:e2108507118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.