IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v118y2021pe2005737118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying collective intelligence in human groups

Author

Listed:
  • Christoph Riedl

    (D’Amore–McKim School of Business, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115; Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115; Network Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115; Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Collective Intelligence, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142)

  • Young Ji Kim

    (Department of Communication, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106)

  • Pranav Gupta

    (Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213)

  • Thomas W. Malone

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Collective Intelligence, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142)

  • Anita Williams Woolley

    (Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213)

Abstract

Collective intelligence (CI) is critical to solving many scientific, business, and other problems, but groups often fail to achieve it. Here, we analyze data on group performance from 22 studies, including 5,279 individuals in 1,356 groups. Our results support the conclusion that a robust CI factor characterizes a group’s ability to work together across a diverse set of tasks. We further show that CI is predicted by the proportion of women in the group, mediated by average social perceptiveness of group members, and that it predicts performance on various out-of-sample criterion tasks. We also find that, overall, group collaboration process is more important in predicting CI than the skill of individual members.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoph Riedl & Young Ji Kim & Pranav Gupta & Thomas W. Malone & Anita Williams Woolley, 2021. "Quantifying collective intelligence in human groups," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118(21), pages 2005737118-, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:118:y:2021:p:e2005737118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/118/21/e2005737118.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wilhelm, Oliver & Kyllonen, Patrick, 2021. "To predict the future, consider the past: Revisiting Carroll (1993) as a guide to the future of intelligence research," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:118:y:2021:p:e2005737118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.