IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v117y2020p14084-14093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequality in socially permissible consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Serena F. Hagerty

    (Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02163)

  • Kate Barasz

    (Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02163)

Abstract

Lower-income individuals are frequently criticized for their consumption decisions; this research examines why. Eleven preregistered studies document systematic differences in permissible consumption — interpersonal judgments about what is acceptable (or not) for others to consume—such that lower-income individuals’ decisions are subject to more negative and restrictive evaluations. Indeed, the same consumption decisions may be deemed less permissible for a lower-income individual than for an individual with higher or unknown income (studies 1A and 1B), even when purchased with windfall funds. This gap persists among participants from a large, nationally representative sample (study 2) and when testing a broad array of “everyday” consumption items (study 3). Additional studies investigate why: The same items are often perceived as less necessary for lower- (versus higher-) income individuals (studies 4 and 5). Combining both permissibility and perceived necessity, additional studies (studies 6 and 7) demonstrate a causal link between the two constructs: A purchase decision will be deemed permissible (or not) to the extent that it is perceived as necessary (or not). However, because—for lower-income individuals—fewer items are perceived as necessary, fewer are therefore socially permissible to consume. This finding not only exposes a fraught double standard, but also portends consequential behavioral implications: People prefer to allocate strictly “necessary” items to lower-income recipients (study 8), even if such items are objectively and subjectively less valuable (studies 9A and 9B), which may result in an imbalanced and inefficient provision of resources to the poor.

Suggested Citation

  • Serena F. Hagerty & Kate Barasz, 2020. "Inequality in socially permissible consumption," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(25), pages 14084-14093, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:14084-14093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/117/25/14084.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guoxin Fu, 2021. "Toward achieving sustainable development goal 3: Determinants, innovations, and reactions from 110 countries with different income levels," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 607-623, July.
    2. Benedikt Schnurr, 2022. "People in the United States judge the success of individuals from higher- versus lower-income families as less deserving," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:14084-14093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.