IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v115y2018p9216-9221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher A. Bail

    (Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708)

  • Lisa P. Argyle

    (Department of Political Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602)

  • Taylor W. Brown

    (Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708)

  • John P. Bumpus

    (Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708)

  • Haohan Chen

    (Department of Political Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708)

  • M. B. Fallin Hunzaker

    (Department of Sociology, New York University, New York, NY 10012)

  • Jaemin Lee

    (Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708)

  • Marcus Mann

    (Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708)

  • Friedolin Merhout

    (Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708)

  • Alexander Volfovsky

    (Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708)

Abstract

There is mounting concern that social media sites contribute to political polarization by creating “echo chambers” that insulate people from opposing views about current events. We surveyed a large sample of Democrats and Republicans who visit Twitter at least three times each week about a range of social policy issues. One week later, we randomly assigned respondents to a treatment condition in which they were offered financial incentives to follow a Twitter bot for 1 month that exposed them to messages from those with opposing political ideologies (e.g., elected officials, opinion leaders, media organizations, and nonprofit groups). Respondents were resurveyed at the end of the month to measure the effect of this treatment, and at regular intervals throughout the study period to monitor treatment compliance. We find that Republicans who followed a liberal Twitter bot became substantially more conservative posttreatment. Democrats exhibited slight increases in liberal attitudes after following a conservative Twitter bot, although these effects are not statistically significant. Notwithstanding important limitations of our study, these findings have significant implications for the interdisciplinary literature on political polarization and the emerging field of computational social science.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher A. Bail & Lisa P. Argyle & Taylor W. Brown & John P. Bumpus & Haohan Chen & M. B. Fallin Hunzaker & Jaemin Lee & Marcus Mann & Friedolin Merhout & Alexander Volfovsky, 2018. "Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115(37), pages 9216-9221, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:9216-9221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/115/37/9216.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:9216-9221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.