IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nap/nijssr/2021p48-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Big, Bad, Audacious Unitus: Building a $1.2 Billion Social Enterprise for Microcredit

Author

Listed:
  • Dr. Warner Woodworth

    (University of Utah, USA)

Abstract

This action research is a social science analysis of a progressive organization over two decades, Unitus, Inc. It was established to accelerate the microfinance movement starting in 2000 to tear down the barriers in order to expand capital for funding poor people’s struggles. The first few dozen NGOs to do this beginning in the 1980s were mostly small, underfunded, and limited in terms of managerial competence. In contrast, Unitus came into being as a social enterprise to remedy these deficiencies. Its founders sought to design a radically visionary approach that would offer a new model for doing microfinance using investment partners, not just small donors. Over the next decade, it raised $1.2 billion, partnering and providing loan capital to various NGOs in 23 countries benefitting many millions of the poor. After a decade of success up through 2010, Unitus then shifted strategically and morphed into different organizations throughout the following years until the present. This paper analyzes the origins, systems, strategies, and successes in achieving such results, as well as challenges, problems and criticisms until 2021.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr. Warner Woodworth, 2021. "Big, Bad, Audacious Unitus: Building a $1.2 Billion Social Enterprise for Microcredit," Noble International Journal of Social Sciences Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 6(4), pages 48-55, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nap:nijssr:2021:p:48-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.napublisher.org/pdf-files/NIJSSR-6(4)-48-55.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.napublisher.org/?ic=journal&journal=7&month=06-2021&issue=4&volume=6
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nap:nijssr:2021:p:48-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.napublisher.org/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.