IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nap/nijssr/2020p12-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception Of Phonological Similarity In Spanish: Examining The Existing Metric Of Neighbourhood Density

Author

Listed:
  • Skott E. Jones

    (Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Ithaca College, Ithaca, New York)

Abstract

The degree to which words are phonologically similar to one another has been termed in the literature as neighbourhood density. It has traditionally been operationalized as a single phonemic difference between words, and subsequently used as an experimental variable in a variety of tasks across a variety of languages. However, few studies to date have assessed the validity of such a metric in a language other than English. In the current study, 23 typical Spanish-speaking adults were presented with 100 CVCV nonwords, and asked to name a similar-sounding Spanish real word after each stimulus. Findings revealed that participants modified an average of two segments per word, in contrast to previous work conducted in English. Participants largely relied on substitutions of final segments, while additions and deletions were less frequently used; a similar average number of changes was made to consonants and vowels. Taken together, the results suggest that using a single-segmental metric to index phonological similarity may not adequately capture unique crosslinguistic differences, especially when considering other influential domains of language such as semantics and morphology.

Suggested Citation

  • Skott E. Jones, 2020. "Perception Of Phonological Similarity In Spanish: Examining The Existing Metric Of Neighbourhood Density," Noble International Journal of Social Sciences Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 5(2), pages 12-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nap:nijssr:2020:p:12-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.napublisher.org/pdf-files/NIJSSR-5(2)-12-21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.napublisher.org/?ic=journal&journal=7&month=02-2020&issue=2&volume=5
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nap:nijssr:2020:p:12-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.napublisher.org/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.