IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nap/nijsrr/2019p67-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Evaluation Of Runoff Coefficients For Some Selected Residential Building Roofing Sheet Materials

Author

Listed:
  • M. O. Amoo

    (Department of Agricultural and Bio-Environmental Engineering Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria)

  • O. O. Olanrewaju

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria)

  • M. A. Adedeji

    (Department of Agricultural and Bio-Environmental Engineering Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria)

Abstract

Water is universally one of the most important natural resources necessary for survival of both plants and animals. Base on a strategy called rainwater harvesting system, a small-scale rainwater harvesting system was assembled in the Teaching and Research Farm of the Agricultural and Environmental Engineering Department, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. The Campus is located in Akure South Local Government Area of the State. It lies between Longitude 5.12° and 5.20° East GMT and Latitudes 7.15° and 7.25° north of the Equator. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance evaluation of water quantity from three roof patterns and three different roofing sheet materials, such as plastic polycarbonate (PPC), clay tile (CT) and metallic (M). Direct collection of rainwater harvested (RWH) served as the control without runoff coefficient (RC).  Rainwater harvested (RWH) for the three roofing sheet materials from August to November, 2017 were obtained in order to determine their runoff coefficient (RC). From the results obtained, PPC roofs RC was 0.82, CT roofs RC was 0.93, while M roofs RC was 1.04, for August. Also PPC roofs RC was 0.78, CT roofs was 0.66 while M roofs RC was 0.77 for September. The RC values obtained for PPC. CT. and M roof materials for October; 0.90, 0.55 and 0.84, respectively. November RC values for PPC, CT and M roof materials were; 0.92, 074, and 0.82, respectively. All these obtained results were compared with the RC standard limit. The control RWH values obtained from this study were generally higher when compared with RWH values obtained for the three roofing sheet materials except for the month of August.

Suggested Citation

  • M. O. Amoo & O. O. Olanrewaju & M. A. Adedeji, 2019. "Comparative Evaluation Of Runoff Coefficients For Some Selected Residential Building Roofing Sheet Materials," Noble International Journal of Scientific Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 3(7), pages 67-71, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nap:nijsrr:2019:p:67-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.napublisher.org/pdf-files/1012-NIJSR-3(7)-67-71.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.napublisher.org/?ic=journal&journal=9&month=07-2019&issue=7&volume=3
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nap:nijsrr:2019:p:67-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.napublisher.org/?ic=journal&journal=9&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.