IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jyf1hn/doi10.1431-79727y2015i1p41-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stimolare le scelte di consumo «green»

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle Bonera
  • Anna Codini
  • Giulia Miniero
  • Elisabetta Corvi

Abstract

The present study contributes to the debate about how to convince consumers to engage into green consumption. It aims to investigate the role that a particular individual difference, the regulatory focus, assumes in green consumer behavior. The regulatory focus is the strategic orientation individuals use to pursue their goals. In particular we want to evaluate if and how the individuals regulatory focus may be a stimulating factor for the adoption of green behavior. One experimental study was conducted aimed at measuring the effect of regulatory focus in green and not green consumption. The study empirically verifies which of the two orientations (promotion/prevention) takes discriminant value in the decision to purchase a green product and, more generally, the comparative analysis of the two conditions confirmed that this effect can be considered to be more noticeable when buying green instead than not green products. Thus, managers and advertisers that want to persuade consumers to engage into green consumption should make sure to take into consideration the regulatory focus boosting effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle Bonera & Anna Codini & Giulia Miniero & Elisabetta Corvi, 2015. "Stimolare le scelte di consumo «green»," Micro & Macro Marketing, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 41-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jyf1hn:doi:10.1431/79727:y:2015:i:1:p:41-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1431/79727
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1431/79727
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jyf1hn:doi:10.1431/79727:y:2015:i:1:p:41-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.