IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jqmthn/doi10.1435-32150y2010i2p211-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Basel Committee proposals to reform the capital adequacy system: empirical evidence from past research and implications for future research activity

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Sironi

Abstract

The recent proposals to reform the minimum capital adequacy framework put forward by the by the Basel Committee in December 2009 have important implications for the future of the international financial system and of the banking industry. These proposals concern issues such as minimum liquidity requirements, the definition of bank capital, the procyclicality of capital requirements, systemic banks, the requirements related to market risks in banks' trading books and leverage. This paper critically discusses and evaluates these proposals in light of the empirical evidence provided by theoretical and empirical research in banking. Also, the implications for potential future research subjects are highlighted with reference to implications for both bank management and supervisory authorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Sironi, 2010. "The Basel Committee proposals to reform the capital adequacy system: empirical evidence from past research and implications for future research activity," Banca Impresa Società, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 211-236.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jqmthn:doi:10.1435/32150:y:2010:i:2:p:211-236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1435/32150
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1435/32150
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bank; capital regulation; Basel.;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jqmthn:doi:10.1435/32150:y:2010:i:2:p:211-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.