IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jl9ury/doi10.1425-32735y2010i2p219-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Myopic gatekeepers? Organizational factors in control failures

Author

Listed:
  • Maurizio Catino

Abstract

The article analyzes two important problems in the audit system: the first is related to the object of the auditors activity and characterized by radical uncertainty; the second concerns the relationship between auditor and corporate client. Through a multilevel framework of analysis the article identifies the micro, meso, and macro level factors that are responsible for voluntary as well as unintentional errors in the auditing process (i.e., auditors' biased assessments, the blurring of boundaries between auditing and consultancy services, and lobbing-activities oriented at blocking institutional reforms). Moreover, the article highlights the interdependences between levels, coming to the conclusion that a proper analysis of failures in the audit system cannot limit itself to assess individual auditors' inability or corruption, but needs to take into account organizational and institutional factors as well. Finally, the research argues that the reforms subsequent to the Enron scandal did not solve the conflict of interest between auditors and their corporate clients and did not reduce the problems of transparency and independency, as the recent financial crisis has shown.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurizio Catino, 2010. "Myopic gatekeepers? Organizational factors in control failures," Stato e mercato, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 219-254.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/32735:y:2010:i:2:p:219-254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1425/32735
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1425/32735
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/32735:y:2010:i:2:p:219-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.