IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jkrece/doi10.1446-27879y2008i3p367-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diversité culturelle et dialogue interculturel: confusion ou exigence?

Author

Listed:
  • François de Bernard

Abstract

As they became among the favourite slogan of European and international official discourse over the last decade, «cultural diversity» and «intercultural dialogue» have reciprocally suffered a lasting language distortion and been increasingly subject to a loss of conceptual relevance. This paper aims at disentangling the intuitive, pervading and media-fed semantic assimilation of both expressions by analysing their conceptual singularity, on the one hand, and highlighting their philosophical articulation, on the other hand. This should rely on the initial recognition of the conflicting process they refer to, far from the poor and consensual meaning of «factual variety» for cultural diversity, and of «pacific culture encounter» for intercultural dialogue. Only such relentless effort of articulation between these two concepts can enable the cosmopolitical project they herald to be understood by citizens, and more efficiently anchored in contemporary national, regional and international political agendas.

Suggested Citation

  • François de Bernard, 2008. "Diversité culturelle et dialogue interculturel: confusion ou exigence?," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 367-378.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/27879:y:2008:i:3:p:367-378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1446/27879
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/27879
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/27879:y:2008:i:3:p:367-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.