IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jhpfyn/doi10.1434-37825y2012i2p367-376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Italian Competition Authority and Monti's government decreees

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Heimler

Abstract

Law decree 6 December 2011, n. 201, assigns to the Italian competition authority newpowers for strengthening its competition advocacy functions and modifies the turnover thresholds for merger notification. The Authority is now obliged to provide a report on all government proposals that may affect competition. While such new powers are welcome, they have to be coordinated with the provisions of decree n. 170/08 on regulatory impact analysis in order to avoid duplications and overlapping. The power to request the Courts to overrule acts of public Administration that violate the competition rules should be interpreted as implying that the Authority could intervene when such acts require or favor the adoption of practices contrary to the antitrust rules, extending to a domestic authority the powers of the European Commission. Finally law decree 20 January 2012, n. 1, unifies the merger notification thresholds that were previously in place, leading to the establishment of the highest domestic thresholds in the Eu. Considering international best practices, it would have been better to introduce a system where notification would be mandatory when the domestic turnover of two of the firms involved in the merger was above 30 million euro.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Heimler, 2012. "The Italian Competition Authority and Monti's government decreees," Mercato Concorrenza Regole, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 367-376.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/37825:y:2012:i:2:p:367-376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1434/37825
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1434/37825
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/37825:y:2012:i:2:p:367-376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.