IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jhpfyn/doi10.1434-121y2001i1p193-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dominanza collettiva e fusioni alla prova di San Tommaso

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Coscelli
  • Andrea Lofaro

Abstract

This article discusses the European Commission's decision to block the proposed acquisition by "Airtours", a UK package tour operator of "First Choice" a direct rival, because it would have created a collectively dominant position. This decision has already been discussed in a number of recent articles by leading antitrust experts as the proposed merger would not have created a duopoly, the product was differentiated rather than homogeneous and the market has traditionally been very dynamic, with substantial entry, expansion and exit taking place over time. The article mostly focuses on the stability of the collusive mechanism envisaged by the Commission and the size of the barriers to entry (and growth) in the market. These two issues are likely to play a major role in the forthcoming proceedings before the Court of First Instances, to whom Airtours has appealed.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Coscelli & Andrea Lofaro, 2001. "Dominanza collettiva e fusioni alla prova di San Tommaso," Mercato Concorrenza Regole, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 193-210.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/121:y:2001:i:1:p:193-210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1434/121
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1434/121
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/121:y:2001:i:1:p:193-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.