IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/je8794/doi10.1429-80932y2015i2p175-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Budgeting in Turkey: An Assessment of Local Practices from the Well-Being Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Gulay Gunluk-Senesen
  • Yelda Yucel
  • Aysegul Yakar-Onal
  • Burcu Yakut-Cakar
  • Nuray Ergunes

Abstract

This paper introduces the basic methodology and general findings of the researchproject entitled «Public Policies, Local Governments, Gender Budgeting: Women Friendly Cities,Case of Turkey». The aim of the project was to analyse public policies at the local level, theservices and expenditures of the municipalities in particular from the gender well-being perspective.Main driver of the research was the expectation that promotion of gender mainstreamingin public policy design would have reflections in resource allocation in those pilot cities, whichcommitted to the United Nations Joint Program-Women Friendly Cities Project (UNJP-WFCP)in Turkey since 2006. Five WFCP cities in different geographical regions (Kars, Sanlıurfa, Nevsehir,Izmir, Samsun) were chosen and each was coupled with five neigbouring cities (Erzurum,Diyarbakir, Kayseri, Manisa, Ordu). Comparative analyses were conducted by: 1. gender auditingof policy documents; 2. cross-checking of perceptions of local service providers with thoseof local women beneficiaries; and 3. de-construction of municipality budgets on the basis ofwomen's capabilities. Our well-being gender budgeting exercises showed that UNJP-WFCP citieswere not much different from others in allocating funds to programmes that have the potentialto enhance women's capabilities. We discuss the interaction of multiplicity of issues whichneed to be accounted for in assessments of current and prospective policy practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Gulay Gunluk-Senesen & Yelda Yucel & Aysegul Yakar-Onal & Burcu Yakut-Cakar & Nuray Ergunes, 2015. "Gender Budgeting in Turkey: An Assessment of Local Practices from the Well-Being Perspective," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 175-194.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/80932:y:2015:i:2:p:175-194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1429/80932
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1429/80932
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/80932:y:2015:i:2:p:175-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.