IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/j0hje1/doi10.1430-98704y2020i4p735-767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asset Quality Review and Prudential Provisioning: A Proposal from a Access to Credit Point of View

Author

Listed:
  • Maurizio Polato
  • Josanco Floreani

Abstract

As part of the Asset Quality Review conducted by the ecb since 2014 with reference tothe main European banks, indicators typically used in corporate finance have been introduced.The element that unites the new guidelines appears to be the progressive abandonment of abackward-looking logic to embrace a fully forward-looking perspective based on the appreciationof cash flows. In the aqr framework, ebitda and dscr have assumed particular importance.As is known, the «aqr manual», with specific reference to the calculation of prudentialprovisioning, provides that banks, in a going concern perspective, estimate the recoverableamount of loans by appropriately discounting the cash flows. The aim of the work is to analysethe prudential provisioning model identified in the aqr framework in order to propose ageneralization starting from the expected dscr of the borrower. The paper highlights how an«economic» approach to provisioning tends to reward companies capable of generating adequateprospective cash flows, in this way mitigating the potential allocative distortions implicitin the incentive structure underlying the aqr approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurizio Polato & Josanco Floreani, 2020. "Asset Quality Review and Prudential Provisioning: A Proposal from a Access to Credit Point of View," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 4, pages 735-767.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/98704:y:2020:i:4:p:735-767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1430/98704
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1430/98704
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/98704:y:2020:i:4:p:735-767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.