IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/j0hje1/doi10.1430-8114y2002i4p745-770.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La regolamentazione delle professioni in Italia: evidenze empiriche e proposte di modifica

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Sterlacchini

Abstract

The paper deals with the Italian system that regulates the access to liberal professions and the conduct of professional people. In particular, the analysis focuses upon the economic rationale of the regulatory system, its possible anti-competitive effects and the recent proposals for reforming it. Subsequently, the findings of an empirical study concerned with a sample of Italian graduates who have tried to carry out a liberal profession are presented and discussed. They show, firstly, that the admission rates are characterised by marked and unjustifiable differences, both over time and between professions and admission bodies. Secondly, it emerges that the long training period that some would-be professionals are compelled to accomplish is not always useful and effective. With respect to the reform proposals, there is a wide consensus on the need of changing the admission exams by introducing clear and homogeneous selection criteria. Only the graduates that already carry out a profession agree to abolish the ban of performing advertising activities, while there is a wide disagreement with respect to the liberalisation of professional tariffs.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Sterlacchini, 2002. "La regolamentazione delle professioni in Italia: evidenze empiriche e proposte di modifica," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 4, pages 745-770.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/8114:y:2002:i:4:p:745-770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1430/8114
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1430/8114
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/8114:y:2002:i:4:p:745-770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.