IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/j0hje1/doi10.1430-37079y2012i1p165-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Evidences on the Productivity Slowdown in Italy and in Italian North East Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Enrico Tundis
  • Enrico Zaninotto

Abstract

This paper analyzes the trend of industrial productivity in Italy in the decade preceding the 2008 crisis and compares manufacturing sectors in North East regions with other areas of the country, using a large database of manufacturing firms. The Malmquist productivity growth index is calculated by means of a robust non-parametric approach and decomposed into the two components of technical change and efficiency change. The results show that the index components follow different patterns in subperiods: before 2000 the productivity slow-down is due mainly to the technological change component, while in the years 2003-2006 we observe a technological advancement that is partly eroded by a growing inefficiency. These empirical evidences seem to reconcile two alternative views, the one highlighting the regress of Italian manufacturing and the other emphasizing the existence of a dynamic tier of medium size firms, that have emerged in the interpretation of the evolution of Italian industry in the last decade.

Suggested Citation

  • Enrico Tundis & Enrico Zaninotto, 2012. "New Evidences on the Productivity Slowdown in Italy and in Italian North East Regions," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 165-192.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/37079:y:2012:i:1:p:165-192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1430/37079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1430/37079
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/37079:y:2012:i:1:p:165-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.