IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/j0hje1/doi10.1430-105162y2022i3p403-423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Transition in the nrrp: Some Thoughts on the Processes of Change and Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Silvestri
  • Dominique Lepore
  • Francesca Spigarelli
  • Lauretta Rubini

Abstract

The covid-19 pandemic caused a great economic and production shock at the global level, against which there has been an equally strong and rapid reaction from governments around the world. The eu has deployed various support tools, the main one being the Next Generation eu. To access this fund each country has been asked to prepare a National Recovery and Resilience Plan (nrrp). This contribution focuses on the Italian nrrp for the part concerning the ecological transition, and in particular Mission 2, «Green revolution and ecological transition». The Mission’s structure, objectives and ability to encourage change and innovation are discussed and implications for both policy makers and future research are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Silvestri & Dominique Lepore & Francesca Spigarelli & Lauretta Rubini, 2022. "Ecological Transition in the nrrp: Some Thoughts on the Processes of Change and Innovation," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 403-423.
    • Handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/105162:y:2022:i:3:p:403-423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1430/105162
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1430/105162
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valentina Costa & Federico Campanini, 2024. "Community-Centred Energy Planning: Within and beyond Administrative Borders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/105162:y:2022:i:3:p:403-423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.