IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jas888/v8y2020i3p193-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pelleting on the Nutritional Quality of Broiler Feeds

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel Cristina Vaccari Mores
  • Keysuke Muramatsu
  • Alex Maiorka
  • Uislei Antonio Dias Orlando
  • Julia Marixara Sousa da Silva
  • Lorrayne Moraes de Paulo
  • Alison Batista Vieira Silva Gouveia
  • Weslane Justina da Silva
  • Jiovanna Gonçalves Sousa
  • Cíntia Silva Minafra e Rezende
  • Cibele Silva Minafra

Abstract

In the pelleting process, mash feed passes through a conditioner were it is exposed to steam under high pressure and pushed through the die to form pellets. To determine the effect of adding different amounts of water and different thermal processing parameters on the pellet conversion percentage, pellet durability index (PDI) and solubility of protein in KOH of broiler feed. The processing factors were combined in a 4x2 factorial scheme- four moisture addition levels (0%; 0.7%; 1.4%; 2.1%), and two thermal processes (conditioning-pelleting or conditioning-expanding-pelleting). Eight samples of each treatment were collected to evaluate quality parameters. The feed used in this study was a typical corn-soybean broiler diet processed in a commercial feed mill. The pellet conversion percentage and PDI responded linearly and positively in the range of 0 to 2.1% moisture addition. Positive and linear equations relating moisture addition in the conditioner with pellet conversion percentage and PDI were obtained (p<0.001). Expansion improved PDI and pellet percentage respectively by 18% and 21% when compared to simple conditioning-pelleting feed processing. However, an adverse effect on protein quality was observed when higher processing temperature was used. No particle size effect was observed for conditioned-expanded-pelleted feed. Medium particle size resulted in better PDI and higher pellet conversion percentage (p < 0.001) compared to coarse grinding (% pellets – 66.97% versus 64.96%; PDI – 77.30% versus 66.10%).

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel Cristina Vaccari Mores & Keysuke Muramatsu & Alex Maiorka & Uislei Antonio Dias Orlando & Julia Marixara Sousa da Silva & Lorrayne Moraes de Paulo & Alison Batista Vieira Silva Gouveia & Weslan, 2020. "Pelleting on the Nutritional Quality of Broiler Feeds," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(3), pages 193-206, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:jas888:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:193-206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/16072/12878
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/16072
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jas888:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:193-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.