IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ber888/v10y2020i2p341-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drivers Contributing to the Implementation of Generalized Audit Software (GAS) within Audit Firms in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Nor Nadia Normahazan
  • Intan Salwani Mohamed
  • Nabilah Rozzani

Abstract

Many businesses are moving towards the usage of information technology to be in line with their daily operations. Traditional audit methods are no longer relevant these days. Generalized Audit Software (GAS) is a type of software that is suitable for auditors to perform audit tasks. GAS can assist auditors to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of audit. To date, the development of GAS in audit firms is still low, although many practitioners had argued that auditors can receive greater benefits by using GAS. This research is motivated by an interest in understanding drivers contributing to the implementation of GAS within audit firms located in the central region of Malaysia. Prior studies had placed more focus on internal auditors in large accounting firms, or auditors in other countries. However, there were not many researches being conducted on small and medium-sized audit firms in Malaysia. This study is therefore intended to fill in this gap. Data were collected using questionnaire survey on small and medium-sized audit firms registered with the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (MIA) in the central region of Malaysia. A total of 96 responses were analysed using multiple regression analysis. It was found that performance expectation, effort expectation and facilitating conditions had significantly influenced the implementation of GAS among small and medium-sized audit firms. However, social influence was found to have no significant relationship. The outcome of this study might help audit firms, software developers and academia to increase the usage of GAS to perform audit tasks. Future research should further explore on the influence of gender, age, voluntariness, experience, and other drivers contributing to the implementation of GAS within audit firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Nor Nadia Normahazan & Intan Salwani Mohamed & Nabilah Rozzani, 2020. "Drivers Contributing to the Implementation of Generalized Audit Software (GAS) within Audit Firms in Malaysia," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 341-354, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:341-354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/view/16862/13297
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/view/16862
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oded Nov & Chen Ye, 2009. "Resistance to change and the adoption of digital libraries: An integrative model," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(8), pages 1702-1708, August.
    2. Fischer, Michael J., 1996. ""Real-izing" the benefits of new technologies as a source of audit evidence: An interpretive field study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(2-3), pages 219-242.
    3. Curtis, Mary B. & Payne, Elizabeth A., 2008. "An examination of contextual factors and individual characteristics affecting technology implementation decisions in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 104-121.
    4. Shin, Dong-Hee, 2010. "MVNO services: Policy implications for promoting MVNO diffusion," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 616-632, November.
    5. Mary B. Curtis & Elizabeth A. Payne, 2014. "Modeling voluntary CAAT utilization decisions in auditing," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 29(4), pages 304-326, April.
    6. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    7. Sikka, Prem, 2009. "Financial crisis and the silence of the auditors," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 868-873, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Afsay, Akram & Tahriri, Arash & Rezaee, Zabihollah, 2023. "A meta-analysis of factors affecting acceptance of information technology in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bierstaker, James & Janvrin, Diane & Lowe, D. Jordan, 2014. "What factors influence auditors' use of computer-assisted audit techniques?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 67-74.
    2. Siew, Eu-Gene & Rosli, Khairina & Yeow, Paul H.P., 2020. "Organizational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    3. Pernilla Broberg & Torbjörn Tagesson & Daniela Argento & Niclas Gyllengahm & Ola Mårtensson, 2017. "Explaining the influence of time budget pressure on audit quality in Sweden," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(2), pages 331-350, June.
    4. Federica De Santis, 2018. "Big Data e revisione contabile: uno studio esplorativo nel contesto italiano," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 129-154.
    5. Ahmad Almagrashi & Abdulwahab Mujalli & Tehmina Khan & Osama Attia, 2023. "Factors determining internal auditors’ behavioral intention to use computer-assisted auditing techniques: an extension of the UTAUT model and an empirical study," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Afsay, Akram & Tahriri, Arash & Rezaee, Zabihollah, 2023. "A meta-analysis of factors affecting acceptance of information technology in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    7. Ruhnke, Klaus & Schmitz, Stefanie, 2019. "Review engagements – structure of audit firm methodology and its situational application in Germany," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    8. Sojung Lucia Kim & Thompson S.H. Teo & Anol Bhattacherjee & Kichan Nam, 0. "IS auditor characteristics, audit process variables, and IS audit satisfaction: An empirical study in South Korea," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    9. Dermarkar, Simon & Hazgui, Mouna, 2022. "How auditors legitimize commercialism: A micro-discursive analysis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Gérald Lobo & Luc Paugam & Lana Zhang & Jean-François Casta, 2013. "Effect Of Joint Auditor Pair On Conserv A Tism: Evidence From Impairment Tests," Post-Print hal-00993007, HAL.
    11. Sanoran, Kanyarat (Lek), 2018. "Auditors’ going concern reporting accuracy during and after the global financial crisis," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 164-178.
    12. Maroun, Warren & Atkins, Jill, 2014. "Section 45 of the Auditing Profession Act: Blowing the whistle for audit quality?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 248-263.
    13. Kohler, Hervé & Pochet, Christine & Gendron, Yves, 2021. "Networks of interpretation: An ethnography of the quest for IFRS consistency in a global accounting firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    14. Marie Caussimont & David Carassus, 2015. "L’audit financier en contexte territorial : vers un audit de performance de la gestion locale ?," Post-Print hal-02141946, HAL.
    15. repec:agr:journl:v:2(602):y:2015:i:2(602):p:151-162 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Sojung Lucia Kim & Thompson S.H. Teo & Anol Bhattacherjee & Kichan Nam, 2017. "IS auditor characteristics, audit process variables, and IS audit satisfaction: An empirical study in South Korea," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 577-591, June.
    17. Chen, Long & Krishnan, Gopal V. & Yu, Wei, 2018. "The relation between audit fee cuts during the global financial crisis and earnings quality and audit quality," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 14-31.
    18. Elena DOBRE & Laura BRAD, 2015. "Financial audit – feckless for economic re-launch," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(2(603), S), pages 151-162, Summer.
    19. Abdalwali Lutfi & Hamza Alqudah, 2023. "The Influence of Technological Factors on the Computer-Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques Usage during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Beattie, Vivien & Fearnley, Stella & Hines, Tony, 2010. "Factors Affecting Audit Quality in the 2007 UK Regulatory Environment: Perceptions of Chief Financial Officers, Audit Committee Chairs and Audit Engagement Partners," SIRE Discussion Papers 2012-29, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    21. Cristina CARANICA, 2016. "Research Regarding the Use of IT Instruments in Financial Audit," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(133), pages 1-95, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Auditor; Auditor effectiveness; Small and medium-sized audit firm; Audit software; Generalized Audit Software;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:341-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.