IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr19_02_02.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural disasters and local government finance

Author

Listed:
  • Mitsunari Ishida

    (Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics, Toyo University)

  • Taro Ohno

    (Chief Economist, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance)

  • Wataru Kobayashi

    (Professor, Faculty of Policy Informatics, Chiba University of Commerce / Senior Research Fellow, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance)

Abstract

We examine the quantitative impact of natural disasters, including earthquakes, on the cash flow as well as debt and other financial conditions of municipalities, using data from the Administrative Cash Flow Statements prepared by the Ministry of Finance to clarify the debt repayment capacity and cash flow status of local governments. We found that municipalities affected by natural disasters, except for the Great East Japan Earthquake, faced a temporary deterioration in net cash flow per capita, cash flow from administrative activities, and primary balance immediately after the occurrence of the disaster. The reason for the deterioration in net cash flow was that the cash flow from extraordinary administrative activities could not be compensated for by the cash flow from ordinary administrative activities and cash flow from financing activities. This was reflected in the increase in the balance of local bonds and the decrease in the balance of the public finance adjustment fund, which has been declining since the first year of the disaster. Although there is a national financial assistance program for disaster-affected municipalities, municipalities have been withdrawing from the public finance adjustment fund and using it to finance emergency and restoration activities. The cash flow from administrative activities began to improve six years after the disaster, but this was due to an increase in local allocation tax grants for the principal and interest repayment of local bonds issued for disaster recovery projects, rather than an increase in tax revenues due to reconstruction. In the municipalities affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake, net cash flow per capita increased after the disaster struck, and cash flow from administrative activities also continued to maintain an increasing trend almost consistently. This indicates that the cash flow situation is rather comfortable compared to those municipalities affected by natural disasters other than the Great East Japan Earthquake. The huge surplus generated by the cash flow from administrative activities is accumulated in special purpose funds and used as a source of funds for reconstruction-related projects to be implemented in subsequent fiscal years. This abundance of balances in the reserve funds greatly reduced the real debt, but as the reconstruction projects progress, the balances in the reserve funds are decreasing. At the current pace, the balance of the reserve funds is expected to drop to the same level as those of other municipalities affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake in the not-too-distant future.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitsunari Ishida & Taro Ohno & Wataru Kobayashi, 2023. "Natural disasters and local government finance," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 19(2), pages 1-41, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr19_02_02
    DOI: 10.57520/prippr.19-2-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.57520/prippr.19-2-2
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.57520/prippr.19-2-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    local governments; administrative cash flow statement; assessment of fiscal conditions; financing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H70 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - General
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr19_02_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.