IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr18_02_04.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local government cash flow situation as viewed from the fiscal indicators of the Assessment of Fiscal Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Taro Ohno

    (Chief Economist, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance)

  • Mitsunari Ishida

    (Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics, Toyo University)

  • Wataru Kobayashi

    (Professor, Faculty of Policy Informatics, Chiba University of Commerce/ Senior Research Fellow, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance)

Abstract

From the viewpoint of confirming the certainty of repayment of fiscal loans to local governments, the Ministry of Finance (MOF) has been conducting the Assessment of the Fiscal Conditions of local governments by creating an Administrative Cash Flow Statement that focuses on cash flows by recombining existing account settlement statistics. This paper uses the fiscal indicators (FY2007-FY2018) to clarify the characteristics of the indicators and examine the cash flow situation. In recent years, while local governments have improved their accumulated and real debt situations, the administrative current balance ratio, which represents the account balance condition, has declined, and their cash flows are becoming increasingly severe. As a result, the number and potential members of local governments that fall under “Fiscal Considerations” based on the diagnostic criteria for the Assessment of Fiscal Conditions have been increasing, and it was found that the increase in expenditures due to property, assistance, and subsidy expenses has contributed to this increase. When the amount of revenues from the hometown tax donation is large, the administrative current balance ratio may apparently deteriorate. However, this does not affect the results of the study. The Assessment of Fiscal Conditions is an effective indicator for understanding the cash flow situation of local government and is also useful from an academic point of view.

Suggested Citation

  • Taro Ohno & Mitsunari Ishida & Wataru Kobayashi, 2022. "Local government cash flow situation as viewed from the fiscal indicators of the Assessment of Fiscal Conditions," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 18(2), pages 1-29, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr18_02_04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr18_02_04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    local governments; local public finance; administrative cash flow statements; Assessment of Fiscal Conditions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H70 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - General
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr18_02_04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.