IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr17_01_05.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taxation on the Digital Economy ―Issues on Implementation and Enforcement―

Author

Listed:
  • Katsufumi Kurihara

    (Professor, Graduate School of Business Sciences, University of Tsukuba)

Abstract

The consideration of a tax system on the digital economy involves challenges related to implementation, such as how to calculate and allocate profits attributable to market countries, and challenges related to enforcement, such as ensuring appropriate tax declaration and payment, avoiding excessive compliance cost, and preventing and eliminating double taxation. New rules should adequately take into consideration the following issues concerning implementation and enforcement. The first issue is the clarity of the requirements regarding the methods of calculating and allocating attributable profits. The second issue is the need for effective systems to require registration in market countries and for information sharing among the tax authorities to ensure appropriate tax declaration and payment, and avoid excessive compliance cost. The third issue is the need to foster an international consensus to allocate profits and develop an effective multilateral framework of dispute settlement. It is required to hold sufficient discussions on how to tax the ever-growing digital economy, which is the issue that significantly affects the future direction of the international tax system.

Suggested Citation

  • Katsufumi Kurihara, 2021. "Taxation on the Digital Economy ―Issues on Implementation and Enforcement―," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 17(1), pages 1-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr17_01_05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr17_01_05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr17_01_05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.