IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr16_03_03.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China’s Unfinished Ownership Reform: Privatization and a Fair and Competitive Environment Remain to be Achieved

Author

Listed:
  • Chi Hung KWAN

    (Senior Fellow, Nomura Institute of Capital Markets Research)

Abstract

The major objective of ownership reform in China is to enable different types of enterprises to realize their capabilities to the maximum by creating a fair and competitive environment and strengthening the corporate governance of state-owned enterprises. To that end, it is necessary to shift the center of gravity of the economy from state-owned enterprises to private enterprises by privatizing the former and promoting the growth of the latter, as well as to separate the government from business through restraining the involvement of the government in the management of state-owned enterprises. However, China has been retreating rather than making progress on both of these initiatives in recent years. Under the Xi Jinping administration, instead of privatization, mixed-ownership reform is being promoted in the form of injecting private capital into state-owned enterprises. However, in most cases, control by state-owned capital has been maintained, so that corporate governance, and by extension, the efficiency of the enterprises concerned, is unlikely to improve. Since China adopted the reform and opening-up policy in the late 1970s, private enterprises that started from scratch have ridden the tide of transition to a market economy and grown to surpass state-owned enterprises in terms of revenue and employment. However, the business performance of private enterprises has turned sluggish recently, thanks to the changing economic environment. Fundamental reform of state-owned enterprises requires privatization. However, if it is politically difficult to achieve, as the second-best option, China should create a fair and competitive environment by minimizing the government’s interventions in business activities. Doing so is also necessary to promote the development of private enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi Hung KWAN, 2020. "China’s Unfinished Ownership Reform: Privatization and a Fair and Competitive Environment Remain to be Achieved," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr16_03_03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr16_03_03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    China; reform of state-owned enterprises; mixed-ownership reform; private enterprises; competitive neutrality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • P31 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Socialist Enterprises and Their Transitions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr16_03_03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.