IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr16_03_02.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politics under Xi Jinping: Centralization and its Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Kazuko Kozima

    (Professor, Faculty of Law, Keio University)

Abstract

This article discusses the centralization implemented by the Xi Jinping administration and its meanings. What the Xi Jinping administration envisages to realize by this centralization is that a disciplined party will centralize the government, military, and industry from the center to the periphery, thereby establishing a fair and sound market economy. The Xi Jinping administration believes that if China continues to diversify and liberalize its economy while maintaining a trend in which connections and honor take precedence over the rule of law, corruption will be fostered and the country will be thrown into disorder by the slackening of governance. The administration is trying to achieve centralization by strengthening the authority of its leaders, strengthening discipline, conducting thorough supervision through the use of inspection (xunshi 巡视) and controlling and exposing people through the rule of law. However, excessive centralization provokes opposition not only from liberal intellectuals, but also from the party leadership. There is a high possibility that the centralization will be watered down by the bureaucracy, who are pretending to obey but secretly betraying. In addition, if the design and operation of credit scoring systems result in human rights violations, the international community will be forced to intensify its criticism.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazuko Kozima, 2020. "Politics under Xi Jinping: Centralization and its Implications," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr16_03_02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr16_03_02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr16_03_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.