IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr14_02_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What needs to be done of personal income tax of Japan? A perspective for reform under deflation and aging population

Author

Listed:
  • Eiji Tajika

    (Professor, Faculty of Economics, Seijo University)

  • Hiroyuki Yashio

    (Professor, Faculty of Economics, Kyoto Sangyo University)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to study the problems and reforms of personal income tax in consideration of the current status of the economy, fiscal position and social security of Japan remaining under prolonged deflation since the collapse of asset bubbles. One prominent feature of the Japanese economy in deflation is that while companies have continued to secure profits, employee income has kept on dropping due to wage cuts and a shift in employment arrangements from regular employment to non - regular employment. As a result, a vicious circle of slumping domestic demand escalating deflation has arisen. In the meantime, the government has supported the Japanese economy through fiscal expansion. Fiscal expansion has shifted from public investment to social security expenditures, so the growth in social security expenditures has continued unchecked amid the ongoing aging of society. Under these circumstances, the generational gap in the tax and social security burdens has been expanding. This paper paid attention to the current situation where the social insurance payments burden has become heavier than the tax burden for younger people with low income. As a reform measure to correct this problem, the paper first called for integrating tax and social security premium burdens into a widely defined income tax burden and for introducing tax credits to lessen the social insurance premium burden that cannot be mitigated through income deduction. Second, the paper argues that in order to finance the tax credit, it is necessary to require people with high income to bear a heavier burden than now by cutting income tax deductions and expanding the tax base, instead of raising the top marginal tax rate, which is currently 55%, including national and local taxes. Third, the paper argues that it is necessary to reform the deductions for social - insurance premiums and public pension. Taking into consideration the feasibility of the reform, the paper argues that it is urgent to abolish the public pension deduction (for calculating income for taxation) for correcting the present inequality of burden among generations and reducing the tax burden on elderly low - income earners.

Suggested Citation

  • Eiji Tajika & Hiroyuki Yashio, 2018. "What needs to be done of personal income tax of Japan? A perspective for reform under deflation and aging population," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 14(2), pages 217-244, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr14_02_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/fy2017/ppr14_02_01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Summers, Lawrence, 2018. "TrumpEconomics: A first year evaluation," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 529-545.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    deflationary economy; personal income tax; social insurance premiums; tax credit; public pension deduction;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • H62 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Deficit; Surplus

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr14_02_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.