IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr029g.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Fiduciary Duties of Directors of the Companies Facing M&As in Delaware and Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Hidefusa Iida

    (Associate Professor, Graduate School of Law, Kobe University)

Abstract

This paper studies the relationship between the Revlon duties and the principle of maximizing shareholders f interests, and its position under the systems of Corporate Law, and then identifies the characteristics of relevant laws in Japan and Delaware. When considering the duties of directors of target companies regarding the fairness of the sale price, the right approach is to discuss how to deal with conflicts of interest and the final-period problem as issues specific to the sale of companies, rather than considering the issue based on deduction from the principle of maximizing shareholders f interests. There are two prominent features of relevant Japanese laws with respect to judicial examination of the duties of directors regarding the appropriateness of the sale price: (1) respect for shareholders f intentions and (2) the approach of paying attention to the price itself, rather than the process of mergers and acquisitions. Among background factors is a consistency with related systems such as regulation on transactions involving conflicts of interest and regulation on issuance of new shares in Corporate Law. Therefore, in order to require revision of the duties of directors of target companies, it is necessary to present a package of reforms regarding relevant systems as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Hidefusa Iida, 2015. "The Fiduciary Duties of Directors of the Companies Facing M&As in Delaware and Japan," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 11(3), pages 485-504, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr029g
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://warp.da.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/11217434/www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr029/ppr029g.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sean Griffith, "undated". "The Costs and Benefits of Precommitment: An Appraisal of Omnicare v. NCS Healthcare," University of Connecticut School of Law Working Papers uconn_ucwps-1014, University of Connecticut School of Law.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr029g. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.