IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr027d.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reforming China's Financial Markets: the Problems of Shadow Banking and Non-performing Loans

Author

Listed:
  • Eiichi Sekine

    (Chief Representative, Nomura Institute of Capital Markets Research, Beijing)

Abstract

In May-June 2013, interest rates rose on China's money market (interbank market). While this was a liquidity problem in the short term, structurally it was the result of the expansion of banks' balance sheets and the development of off-balance-sheet financial products.The latter is also sometimes seen as China's shadow banking problem. Shadow banking in China consists largely of bank wealth management products and trust products, which together have been estimated to make up more than 50% of China's GDP. In recent years, Internet finance has also been growing.The response of the Chinese government at the end of 2013 was to issue an internal directive to the country's monetary authorities and local governments to tighten the regulation of shadow banking, to assign regulators for shadow banking operations and individual financial institutions, and to create a comprehensive regulatory framework.In addition, the Chinese government has set a timetable with a deadline of 2018 for adopting the Basel III framework and is seeking to put bank balance sheets on a sounder footing. While shadow banking in China has some negative aspects, such as circumventing regulation and introducing risk factors into financial markets, it also has some positive aspects, such as making it easier for SMEs to raise capital and offering Chinese households what amount to financial products with deregulated interest rates.Ultimately, the problems need to be solved as part of the process of reforming China's financial markets and fostering the development of the country's securities and asset management industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Eiichi Sekine, 2015. "Reforming China's Financial Markets: the Problems of Shadow Banking and Non-performing Loans," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 11(1), pages 93-140, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr027d
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://warp.da.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/11217434/www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr027/ppr027d.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Shadow banking; wealth management products; trust products; Internet finance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E58 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Central Banks and Their Policies
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr027d. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.