IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mnb/finrev/v19y2020i3p52-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling Corporate Probability of Default – A Possible Supervisory Benchmark Model

Author

Listed:
  • Márk Szenes

    (Magyar Nemzeti Bank)

  • Zsófia Dabi

    (Magyar Nemzeti Bank)

Abstract

In recent years, supervisory bodies around the world have lost some of their confidence in the estimations of credit risk parameters at banks applying the internal ratings-based methodology. Supervisory experience shows that differences in risk metrics and ultimately in regulatory capital requirement levels stem primarily from inconsistencies in the modelling techniques applied and the various methodological approaches, rather than from any actual differences between the inherent risks of bank portfolios. To avoid this unwanted effect, in its supervisory review of banks’ internal capital adequacy assessment process, the Central Bank of Hungary (Magyar Nemzeti Bank, MNB) aims at specifying the necessary capital requirements by developing and applying harmonised benchmark models. This study shows how it is possible to estimate a probability of default (PD) for corporate portfolios, which is based on large banks’ corporate default rate data series and available corporate financial data, uses a harmonised methodology that factors in differences between the credit quality ratings of various customers, and is suitable for the supervisor’s calculation of the capital requirement for any given bank. Nonetheless, there may also be other factors in addition to individual financial data (e.g. qualitative expert elements, sector information) that may affect credit quality; identifying these may be one of the objectives of benchmark model development.

Suggested Citation

  • Márk Szenes & Zsófia Dabi, 2020. "Modelling Corporate Probability of Default – A Possible Supervisory Benchmark Model," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 19(3), pages 52-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:mnb:finrev:v:19:y:2020:i:3:p:52-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://en-hitelintezetiszemle.mnb.hu/letoltes/fer-19-3-st2-szenes-dabi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. György Inzelt & Gábor Szappanos & Zsolt Armai, 2016. "Supervision by robust risk monitoring – a cycle-independent Hungarian corporate credit rating system," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 15(3), pages 51-78.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gergõ Horváth, 2021. "Corporate Credit Risk Modelling in the Supervisory Stress Test of the Magyar Nemzeti Bank," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 20(1), pages 43-73.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gergõ Horváth, 2021. "Corporate Credit Risk Modelling in the Supervisory Stress Test of the Magyar Nemzeti Bank," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 20(1), pages 43-73.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    credit risk; probability of default; rating systems; supervisory benchmark model; PD;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mnb:finrev:v:19:y:2020:i:3:p:52-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Morvay Endre (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnbgvhu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.