IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mnb/bullet/v9y2014i2p23-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Background to the pension insurance recommendation

Author

Listed:
  • József Banyáry
  • Koppany Nagy

    (Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary))

  • Ferenc Szebelédi

    (Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary))

  • László Windisch

    (Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary))

  • Zoltán Zubor

    (Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary))

Abstract

Pension insurance contracts concluded after 1 January 2014 provide eligibility for tax incentives in the context of disposition over taxes. With a view to ensuring that the insurance products available on the market contribute to financial self-reliance, serve customer needs and requirements and comply with the objectives of the legislator, the Magyar Nemzeti Bank issued a recommendation on 26 May 2014. This article summarises the theoretical and practical considerations underlying the recommendation. Our point of departure is that simple, transparent products are best suited to these objectives. The tax incentive alone is a suitable tool for supporting sales and should accordingly be passed on in its entirety as an advantage for customers. Annuities and various combinations thereof are optimal tools for achieving pension objectives, while lumpsum payments are only justified in exceptional cases. In the case of unit linked insurance, special attention must be paid to investments and costs. Long-term savings geared towards pensions should be coupled with life-cycle type investment solutions which contain increasingly lower risk instruments as age progresses, compared to instruments with higher yield potential during the initial period. Customer benefits can only be achieved if excessive costs are avoided, which calls for the introduction and reinforcement of products with better cost indicators compared to those found previously on the market, along with the effective cooperation of intermediaries in disseminating these products among customers.

Suggested Citation

  • József Banyáry & Koppany Nagy & Ferenc Szebelédi & László Windisch & Zoltán Zubor, 2014. "Background to the pension insurance recommendation," MNB Bulletin (discontinued), Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 9(2), pages 23-35, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:mnb:bullet:v:9:y:2014:i:2:p:23-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/banyar-nagy-szebeledi-windisch-zubor.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pablo Antolín, 2008. "Policy Options for the Payout Phase," OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions 25, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes Hagen, 2015. "The determinants of annuitization: evidence from Sweden," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 22(4), pages 549-578, August.
    2. Halimah Sani SAMBO & Shehu Jafaru SALISU, 2020. "Impact Of Life Annuity As Payment Option On Nigerian Pension Funds," Proceedings of Administration and Public Management International Conference, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(1), pages 103-111, October.
    3. Renuka Sane & Susan Thomas, 2014. "The way forward for India's National Pension System," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2014-022, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    pension insurance; financial consumer protection; total cost ratio; pension annuity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mnb:bullet:v:9:y:2014:i:2:p:23-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maja Bajcsy (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnbgvhu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.