The 200 forint denomination will be a coin
AbstractOn 23 June 2008 the Monetary Council of the Magyar Nemzeti Bank decided to reissue the 200 forint coin in the first half of 2009. In this study, we shall summarise the social and technical aspects considered during the preparatory phase of the decision. The case is justified by the difference between the ‘economy’ of small denomination banknotes and large denomination coins. In the case of small denomination banknotes, expenditures are incurred continuously, since – due to their fast wear and tear – significant reproduction costs can be calculated. Wear and tear in the case of larger denomination coins is negligible, therefore expenses are primarily incurred from the one-off manufacturing of the initial stock, which are only supplemented by meeting the demand arising from eventual turnover expansion. Switching to coins – as a function of the year of switching over to the euro – can generate savings of 8%-13% of the cash production costs incurred until then. Since Hungarians use 200 forint banknotes as change, they are quickly damaged and the resulting high reproduction costs increase state budget expenditures, i.e. the taxpayers’ burden. Coins – replacing the easily damaged small denomination banknotes – are more durable, their handling is safer and their use is more practical in numerous cash payment situations. Another consideration was to approximate the denomination series of the forint to that of the euro, thereby accustoming the population to the larger denomination coins and converting them into conscious users. Following transition to the euro, the purchasing power of the coins will be higher than in the forint period, thus the introduction of the 200 forint coin may be considered as preparation for the euro.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Magyar Nemzeti Bank (the central bank of Hungary) in its journal MNB Bulletin.
Volume (Year): 3 (2008)
Issue (Month): 3 (December)
introduce coin; swith to coin; denomination; reproduction cost; expense.;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Johanna Jeney).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.