IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/jpjrnl/v1y2021i2p153-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sympoietic Art Practice in Co-expressive Re-worlding with Hegel’s “Vegetal Subject”

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Charlston

    (Manchester Metropolitan University, UK)

  • David Charlston

    (University of Liverpool, UK)

Abstract

“Sympoietic art practice”, construed as co-creative making-together-with plants, contributes to posthumanist discourse by forming cross-species partnerships which re-configure exploitative relations with plants. The posthumanist commitment of sympoietic practice to live equitably with the more-than-human world is inherently opposed to the tradition of anthropocentrism widely associated with Hegel’s idealization of reason and culture. But when Hegelian philosophy comingles with the radically different assumptions of sympoietic art practice in this exploratory paper, a co-expressive “worlding with plants” emerges. A transformative re-reading of Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature reveals that the English translators have smoothed away the vibrant concept of a “vegetal subject” explicitly used by Hegel in the original German. The resulting interpretive fissure makes space for a creative scrutiny of human exceptionalism, humanist and posthumanist conceptions of plant subjectivity and human-plant relations. Our transdisciplinary article concludes with a performative knitting together and composting of shreds of Hegelian text with vibrantly participative strands of living couch grass.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Charlston & David Charlston, 2021. "Sympoietic Art Practice in Co-expressive Re-worlding with Hegel’s “Vegetal Subject”," Journal of Posthumanism, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 1(2), pages 153-166, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:jpjrnl:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:153-166
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/jp.v1i2.1326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.tplondon.com/jp/article/view/1326/1373
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/jp.v1i2.1326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:jpjrnl:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:153-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TPLondon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.