IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/journl/v17y2020i3p433-444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reframing Xenophobia in South Africa as Colour-Blind: The Limits of the Afro Phobia Thesis

Author

Listed:
  • Amanuel Isak Tewolde

    (University of Johannesburg, South Africa)

Abstract

Many scholars and South African politicians characterize the widespread anti-foreigner sentiment and violence in South Africa as dislike against migrants and refugees of African origin which they named ‘Afro-phobia’. Drawing on online newspaper reports and academic sources, this paper rejects the Afro-phobia thesis and argues that other non-African migrants such as Asians (Pakistanis, Indians, Bangladeshis and Chinese) are also on the receiving end of xenophobia in post-apartheid South Africa. I contend that any ‘outsider’ (White, Asian or Black African) who lives and trades in South African townships and informal settlements is scapegoated and attacked. I term this phenomenon ‘colour-blind xenophobia’. By proposing this analytical framework and integrating two theoretical perspectives — proximity-based ‘Realistic Conflict Theory (RCT)’ and Neocosmos’ exclusivist citizenship model — I contend that xenophobia in South Africa targets those who are in close proximity to disadvantaged Black South Africans and who are deemed outsiders (e.g., Asian, African even White residents and traders) and reject arguments that describe xenophobia in South Africa as targeting Black African refugees and migrants.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanuel Isak Tewolde, 2020. "Reframing Xenophobia in South Africa as Colour-Blind: The Limits of the Afro Phobia Thesis," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 17(3), pages 433-444, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:journl:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:433-444
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v17i3.789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.tplondon.com/ml/article/view/789/760
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v17i3.789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:journl:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:433-444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ML (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.migrationletters.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.