IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/gdjrnl/v9y2022i3p295-305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Türkiye’de Göçe İlişkin Algılar: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Değerlendirme

Author

Listed:
  • Sedef Turper

    (Koç Üniversitesi, Türkiye)

Abstract

The current study employs various datasets to explore Turkish public perceptions of migrants and migration between 2005-2022. Findings of the study demonstrate that Turkish people are more likely to perceive migration as a threat when compared to their European counterparts living in those countries included in this study. While findings reveal that negative perceptions about migration and migrants became even more prevalent among the Turkish public between 2011 and 2018, they further indicate public perceptions of migration and migrants are highly susceptible to contextual factors. Turkish public perceptions about migration and migrants are observed to significantly fluctuate by changing not only in the negative but also in the positive direction within a short period of time. Overall, the findings of the study point to the need of refraining from uni-directional explanations such as compassion fatigue when discussing the over-time changes in Turkish public perceptions of migration and migrants.

Suggested Citation

  • Sedef Turper, 2022. "Türkiye’de Göçe İlişkin Algılar: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Değerlendirme," Goc Dergisi, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 9(3), pages 295-305, Kasım.
    • Handle: RePEc:mig:gdjrnl:v:9:y:2022:i:3:p:295-305
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/gd.v10i1.842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dergi.tplondon.com/goc/article/view/842/853
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/gd.v10i1.842?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:gdjrnl:v:9:y:2022:i:3:p:295-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TPLondon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.