IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mgt/youmng/v6y2011i2p127-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unicriterion Model: A Qualitative Decision Making Method That Promotes Ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Guilherme Silvano Lobo Pimentel

    (Bank of Portugal, Portugal)

Abstract

Management decision making methods frequently adopt quantitative models of several criteria that bypass the question of why some criteria are considered more important than others, which makes more difficult the task of delivering a transparent view of preference structure priorities that might promote ethics and learning and serve as a basis for future decisions. To tackle this particular shortcoming of usual methods, an alternative qualitative methodology of aggregating preferences based on the ranking of criteria is proposed. Such an approach delivers a simple and transparent model for the solution of each preference conflict faced during the management decision making process. The method proceeds by breaking the decision problem into ‘two criteria – two alternatives’ scenarios, and translating the problem of choice between alternatives to a problem of choice between criteria whenever appropriate. The unicriterion model method is illustrated by its application in a car purchase and a house purchase decision problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Guilherme Silvano Lobo Pimentel, 2011. "Unicriterion Model: A Qualitative Decision Making Method That Promotes Ethics," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 6(2), pages 127-146.
  • Handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:6:y:2011:i:2:p:127-146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISSN/1854-4231/6_127-146.pdf
    File Function: full text in English
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISSN/1854-4231/6_205-207.pdf
    File Function: abstract in Slovene
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:6:y:2011:i:2:p:127-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkupsi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.