This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Organizational Learning Process in Slovenian, Croatian, and Malaysian Companies

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Vlado Dimovski (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)
Miha Skerlavaj (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)
Mok Kimman (Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia)
Tomislav Hernaus (University of Zagreb, Croatia)
Abstract

In our contribution we aim to test differences in the way companies learn in Slovenia, Croatia, and Malaysia. We used the Organizational learning measurement instrument developed and tested by Dimovski (1994), Škerlavaj (2003), Dimovski and Škerlavaj (2005). It employs three measurement variables (Information acquisition, Information interpretation, and Behavioural and cognitive changes) as well as 38 items (presented in the paper) to measure the Organizational learning construct. In autumn 2005, data from 203 Slovenian, 202 Croatian, and 300 Malaysian companies were gathered. Results indicate that companies in all three countries under scrutiny are closest in terms of behavioural and cognitive changes, meaning that globalization and other challenges of the modern business environment demand all of them to change and adapt quickly. However, the ways they are coping with those challenges are different. Generally speaking, there are more similarities than dissimilarities between Slovenia and Croatia, while this is not the case when comparing both countries to Malaysia. When acquiring information, Slovenian and Croatian companies rely more on internal sources (own employees, past decisions, etc.), while Malaysian companies tend to rely more on external sources and more often have employees dedicated to searching for external information. When trying to interpret the information acquired, Slovenian and Croatian companies rely more on personal contacts, informal team meetings, and believe that information given to subordinates must be simple and concise, while Malaysian companies tend to use more formal collective decision-making and written communication to understand the meaning of information.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISSN/1854-4231/1_101-113.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: full text in Slovene
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISSN/1854-4231/1_175-177.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: abstract in English
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Article provided by University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper in its journal Management.

Volume (Year): 1 (2006)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 101-113
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:1:y:2006:i:2:p:101-113

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Cankarjeva 5, SI-6104 Koper, PO BOX 345
Phone: 05 610 20 00
Fax: 05 610 20 15
Email:
Web page: http://www.mng.fm-kp.si
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Email:
Web: http://www.mng.fm-kp.si

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Alen Jezovnik).

Related research
Keywords: organizational learning; information acquisition; information interpretation; behavioural and cognitive changes; Slovenia; Croatia; Malaysia;

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? The most prolific authors have over 700 items listed on IDEAS.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-28.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.