IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mgs/jibrme/v2y2017i4p13-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitiveness of Superpowers: Impact of Education and Innovations

Author

Listed:
  • Antanas Buracas

    (Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences, Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

The impact of knowledge determinants on global competitiveness based on multiple criteria assessment methodology and their empirical expert assessment was evaluated taking the comparative expert data of the U.S., Japan, China, and India for a case study. The complex evaluations were determined with an account of the education, knowledge and innovation parameters published in the international reports of the WEF, INSEAD a/o experts. As result of author evaluations was found that differences between the USA and Japan, on the one side, China and India, on other, by GTCI and GII levels are lower than their differences in GDP per capita (PPP). The correlation between GTCI scores and GDP per capita, also between national economic competitiveness and GTC indices is weaker than expected by an approach based on GTCI model. The deep difference in labor productivity per employee was determined by the technical retardation of India and China compared with USA and Japan. At the same time, the differences of superpowers in educating the employable skills are not so significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Antanas Buracas, 2017. "Competitiveness of Superpowers: Impact of Education and Innovations," Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 2(4), pages 13-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:mgs:jibrme:v:2:y:2017:i:4:p:13-19
    DOI: 10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.24.3002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://researchleap.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/2.-Competitiveness-of-Superpowers-Impact-of-Education-and-Innovations.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://researchleap.com/competitiveness-superpowers-impact-education-innovations/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.24.3002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Competitiveness of superpowers; Complex evaluations; GTCI; GDP;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgs:jibrme:v:2:y:2017:i:4:p:13-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bojan Obrenovic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://researchleap.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.