IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/postke/v31y2008i1p57-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effective-demand-constrained growth in a two-sector Kaldorian model

Author

Listed:
  • John S. L. McCombie
  • Mark Roberts

Abstract

The paper presents a formalization of Kaldor's two-sector agriculture-industry model of economic growth. It analyzes the model under two different scenarios. The first scenarioânamely, that of idealized (relative) price adjustment in which growth is unconstrained by effective demandâis already well known in the literature. For Kaldor, however, this scenario represented a purely hypothetical theoretical benchmark. This is because it assumes that price adjustment is guided by notional quantities. In contrast, the second scenario, that of quantity adjustment under conditions of false trading at prices that fail to reconcile notional levels of demand and supply, was considered to be more realistic by Kaldor. This is because, in this scenario, the growth of industry is constrained by a lack of growth of effective demand from agriculture. The formalization in this paper both clarifies and removes what are seen as inconsistencies in Kaldor's model.

Suggested Citation

  • John S. L. McCombie & Mark Roberts, 2008. "Effective-demand-constrained growth in a two-sector Kaldorian model," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 57-78, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:31:y:2008:i:1:p:57-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=N43V17676M2M607H
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isha Gupta, 2022. "Land-constrained growth in a developing economy: A Kaldorian perspective," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 75(302), pages 263-284.
    2. Ricardo Chica & Oscar Guevara & Diana López & Daniel Osorio, 2012. "Growth determinants in Latin America and East Asia: has globalization changed the engines of growth?," Coyuntura Económica, Fedesarrollo, June.
    3. Shantanu Roy & C. Saratchand, 2023. "On the political economy of corporate encroachment in agriculture: short term macroeconomic concerns," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(3), pages 869-897, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:31:y:2008:i:1:p:57-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MPKE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.