IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v57y2023i3p793-807.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Great Hypocrisy: Neoliberalism’s Critique of Modern Monetary Theory

Author

Listed:
  • John P. Watkins
  • James E. Seidelman

Abstract

There is something disingenuous, something hypocritical in the vociferous critiques of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). The hypocrisy among neoliberal economists reveals itself in tacitly accepting quantitative easing (QE) while criticizing MMT. QE involves creating money to purchase treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities, benefiting primarily asset holders. MMT involves creating money to employ people, attaining full employment. Neoliberalism rejects Keynesian interventionism, instead advocating using government to channel market forces in ways that benefit corporations and the affluent. The dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model incorporates the neoliberal vision in showing the irrelevance of fiscal policy in achieving full employment. Problems with the DSGE model revealed themselves in its inability to explain the great financial crisis. Nevertheless, neoliberal economists seek to retain the DSGE model while rejecting MMT. The article further contrasts QE with MMT, showing the similarities and difference between the Fed purchasing assets and the government engaged in functional finance. Governments throughout the world are resorting to creating money to increase employment and sustain their economies, policies advocated by MMT.

Suggested Citation

  • John P. Watkins & James E. Seidelman, 2023. "The Great Hypocrisy: Neoliberalism’s Critique of Modern Monetary Theory," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(3), pages 793-807, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:57:y:2023:i:3:p:793-807
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2023.2237860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2023.2237860
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2023.2237860?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:57:y:2023:i:3:p:793-807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.