IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v51y2017i2p366-374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Veblenian Analysis of For-Profit Universities

Author

Listed:
  • John P. Watkins
  • James E. Seidelman

Abstract

Education policy has been guided by two seemingly opposing forces: (i) broadening access to the community’s knowledge base and (ii) privatizing the costs of that access. Broadening access entails helping marginal students — the poor, minorities, single women, veterans, and so on. Privatizing access involves government-provided loans and grants totaling $138 billion from 2010 to 2016 to students attending for-profit schools. This policy resulted in low graduation rates, while still enriching stock holders, giving them “something for nothing.” Addressing low graduation rates requires changing the accreditation of for-profit schools, a change that affects the allocation of federal funds, changes that the Obama administration tried to implement. The issue raises several questions. First, how would Thorstein Veblen view efforts to expand educational opportunities for students? Second, what factors gave rise to for-profit schools? And third, what policies can we enact to provide students with access to higher education?

Suggested Citation

  • John P. Watkins & James E. Seidelman, 2017. "A Veblenian Analysis of For-Profit Universities," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 366-374, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:51:y:2017:i:2:p:366-374
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2017.1320910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2017.1320910
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2017.1320910?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:51:y:2017:i:2:p:366-374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.