IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v42y2008i3p803-821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More Government or Less Government? Further Thoughts for Promoting the Government

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Chi-ang Lin

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide further thoughts for promoting the government after reviewing the competing insights of the right-wing public choice school economists and the left-wing institutionalists in the VeblenCommons tradition. This paper points out that big government and big business have indeed become complements to some extent. That is, they are symbiotic and one certainly cannot criticize (or try to remove) big government without checking big business at the same time, and vice versa. To counteract the power of corporate hegemony and to break the control of governments by privileged interests, this paper suggests that it is desirable to initiate institutional change in society toward the movement of more local government planning in promoting the local community. Such a society is not only practically consistent with the progress of sustainable development (under the “think globally, act locally” guideline) but also conceptually compatible with John Stuart Mill’s high-minded mental culture and John Maynard Keynes’S forward-looking vision of economic bliss.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Chi-ang Lin, 2008. "More Government or Less Government? Further Thoughts for Promoting the Government," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 803-821, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:42:y:2008:i:3:p:803-821
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2008.11507180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2008.11507180
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2008.11507180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiangzheng Deng & Zhan Wang & Chunhong Zhao, 2016. "Economic Evolution In China Ecologically Fragile Regions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 552-576, July.
    2. Natalya Rakuta, 2015. "Life-Cycle Contracts in public procurement," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 53-78.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:42:y:2008:i:3:p:803-821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.