IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v59y2023i8p2747-2774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Inquiry Letters Make R&D Information Pricing More Effective? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Yu
  • Yi-Tsung Lee

Abstract

There are information transfer motives and earnings management motives for the disclosure of R&D expense information. These two motives contradict each other, which can cause distortion of corporate R&D expense information and lead to mispricing of R&D information. In this paper, we investigate the market reaction to R&D expense inquiry letters (hereafter, RDILs) and their impact mechanism from the perspective of correcting R&D information mispricing by using Chinese A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2019. We find that RDILs have a significantly negative market reaction, suggesting that they have additional information content. Mechanism analyses indicate that this information content is affected by the inquiry letter characteristics and the R&D characteristics of the inquired firm. The findings of this paper have implications for how developing countries can use capital markets to stimulate corporate innovation, and for the establishment of proactive inquiry mechanisms to address the mispricing of innovation information. Exchanges in other countries should consider their use.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Yu & Yi-Tsung Lee, 2023. "Can Inquiry Letters Make R&D Information Pricing More Effective? Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(8), pages 2747-2774, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:59:y:2023:i:8:p:2747-2774
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2023.2190848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2023.2190848
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2023.2190848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:59:y:2023:i:8:p:2747-2774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.