IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v59y2023i6p1690-1706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Corporate Bond Risk Premium and Default Based on Voluntary Dual Ratings Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Qianlong Yu
  • Xiaoyi Xiao
  • Yimin Li

Abstract

This study examines the key influencing factors of voluntary dual ratings selection in corporate bond financing and the effect of dual ratings on risk premium and default risk, based on corporate bond data issued from 2016 to 2021. It shows that the worse the bond issuers’ credit qualifications, the more likely they are to seek dual ratings before issuance. Compared to a single credit rating, the risk premium for a bond with dual ratings is lower, and the effect becomes more significant in the low-rated and non-listed company samples. There are dual ratings before bond issuance, and the higher the average credit rating level of the bond, the lower the bond’s default risk. The research findings provide a theoretical basis and empirical evidence for the practice of voluntary dual ratings in China, expand research on the influencing mechanism of bond issuance pricing in the context of voluntary dual ratings selection, and examine the information content of credit ratings from the perspective of their ability to predict bond default.

Suggested Citation

  • Qianlong Yu & Xiaoyi Xiao & Yimin Li, 2023. "Research on Corporate Bond Risk Premium and Default Based on Voluntary Dual Ratings Selection," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(6), pages 1690-1706, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:59:y:2023:i:6:p:1690-1706
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2022.2147786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2022.2147786
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2022.2147786?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:59:y:2023:i:6:p:1690-1706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.