This article discusses the evolution of the social security system in China since the opening-up policy of 1978 and reviews the framework of the partially funded scheme or what is known as the system of combining a social pool with individual accounts. It argues that, although the partially funded scheme during the past ten years has been improved, taking both sustainability and redistribution into account, it still faces some dangers that might devolve into defined benefit (DB) pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) because of the lack of transition costs. Some lessons are also drawn in that the partially funded scheme has not been well designed, both in its transition schedule and in many of its subsystems, such as the limited scale of individual accounts. This means that it is a loser as a policy choice but a winner as a strategic arrangement, which may cause moral hazard and adverse selection in many respects, such as contribution collection and early retirement. Finally, the "888 solution" is offered as a proposal with partial notional defined contribution (NDC) design.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by M.E. Sharpe, Inc. in its journal Chinese Economy.