This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Short-Run Cost Inefficiency of Commercial Banks: A Flexible Stochastic Frontier Approach

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Kaparakis, Emmanuel I
Miller, Stephen M
Noulas, Athanasios G

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

We adopt the intermediation approach, and use a flexible stochastic frontier to examine the cost efficiency of United States commercial banks with total assets in excess of & Million. We find an average overall inefficiency of just under 10 percent, a level somewhat lower than found in previous work. Our analysis of intra-industry variation concludes that inefficiency generally rises with bank size. Further, banks that have branching networks, either domestic or foreign, have higher inefficiency, on average; but, at the same time, inefficiency falls as the number of offices in the branch network expands. State level data on the ease of serviceing the market, competition from savings institutions, and the financial sophistication of depositors significantly affect bank inefficiency, generally with the expected signs. Finally, our findings suggest that regulatory changes that increase capital requirements may lead to increased bank efficiency in the short run. Copyright 1994 by Ohio State University Press.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-2879%28199411%2926%3A4%3C875%3ASCIOCB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-8&origin=bc
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: full text
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Blackwell Publishing in its journal Journal of Money, Credit and Banking.

Volume (Year): 26 (1994)
Issue (Month): 4 (November)
Pages: 875-93
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:mcb:jmoncb:v:26:y:1994:i:4:p:875-93

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2879

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Subal Khumbhakar, 2006. "Specification and estimation of nonstandard profit functions," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 243-260, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  2. David C. Wheelock & Paul W. Wilson, 1997. "New evidence on returns to scale and product mix among U.S. commercial banks," Working Papers 1997-003, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  3. Allen N. Berger & Loretta J. Mester, 1997. "Inside the black box: what explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions?," Working Papers 97-1, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. David C. Wheelock & Paul W. Wilson, 1995. "Why do banks disappear? The determinants of U.S. bank failures and acquisitions," Working Papers 1995-013, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  5. Ben-Belhassen, Boubaker & Womack, Abner W., 2000. "Measurement And Explanation Of Technical Efficiency In Missouri Hog Production," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21819, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association). [Downloadable!]
  6. Carlos Pestana Barros & Rui Cunha Marques, 2008. "Performance of European Airports: Regulation, Ownership and Managerial Efficiency," Working Papers 2008/25, Department of Economics at the School of Economics and Management (ISEG), Technical University of Lisbon.. [Downloadable!]
  7. Heejoon Kang & Michele Fratianni, 2006. "International Trade Efficiency, the Gravity Equation, and the Stochastic Frontier," Working Papers 2006-08, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy. [Downloadable!]
  8. Leonardo Becchetti & Jaime Humberto Sierra Gonzalez 2, 2003. "Bankruptcy Risk and Productive Efficiency in Manufacturing Firms," CEIS Research Paper 30, Tor Vergata University, CEIS. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  9. William Greene, 2008. "A Stochastic Frontier Model with Correction for Sample Selection," Working Papers 08-9, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  10. Guohua Feng & Apostolos Serletis, 2007. "Efficiency and Productivity of the US Banking Industry, 1998-2005: Evidence from the Fourier Cost Function Satisfying Global Reg," Working Papers 2007-13, Department of Economics, University of Calgary, revised 11 Dec 2007. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS also computes impact factors for journals and working paper series.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-12.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.