IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mbr/jmbres/v10y2017i33p481-508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Loans Cost or Fair Value, Which One Has More Effect on Credit Loss of Banking System (in Persian)

Author

Listed:
  • Taheri, Mandana

    (Iran)

  • Rahmani, Ali

    (Iran)

Abstract

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 13 (fair value measurement) and IFRS 9 (credit loss discount estimate) have allowed financial institutions to report their financial assets and liabilities based on fair value. For banks, the bank facility is one of the financial assets that can be reported by fair value. Disclosure and reporting of cost or fair value of banks facilities as a part of banks financial assets and effect of each method on banks credit loss and risk is one of the significant issues that has always been discussed. Since 1990, the first standard in this area has been issued, the topic, was discussed by academic and professional bodies.the suggestions results show that there are different opinions about using the fair value method. In this paper, we use cost data extracted from the financial statements of 23 Iranian banks the period of 2007-2015 and estimate their fair value of loans. we examine effects of their fair value and cost on banking credit loss. To estimate the fair value, we used cash flow discount model proposed by Federal Reserve of America. The results for Iranian banking system show that the cost of loans method in comparison with the fair value method is better in forecasting banks credit loss

Suggested Citation

  • Taheri, Mandana & Rahmani, Ali, 2017. "Financial Loans Cost or Fair Value, Which One Has More Effect on Credit Loss of Banking System (in Persian)," Journal of Monetary and Banking Research (فصلنامه پژوهش‌های پولی-بانکی), Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 10(33), pages 481-508, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:mbr:jmbres:v:10:y:2017:i:33:p:481-508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jmbr.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-752-en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://jmbr.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-752-en.html
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://jmbr.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-752-fa.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mbr:jmbres:v:10:y:2017:i:33:p:481-508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M. E. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mbcbiir.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.