IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev4rl/v18y2022i3-4p84-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public versus Political Decision in Administrative Space

Author

Listed:
  • Mădălina-Elena MIHÄ‚ILESCU

    (Associate Professor PhD, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Department of Administrative Sciences and Regional Studies, “Dunărea de Jos", University of Galati, Lawyer Galati County Bar Association)

Abstract

This article aims to make a brief review of some important issues related to the "opening" of the administration to citizens in Romania and to describe, briefly, some recent decisions taken by various local councils in large cities of Romania (such as Cluj-Napoca, Iasi, Craiova or Galati) and which testify to the willingness of local and central authorities to really address those on whom their decisions will really produce their effects. To our pleasant surprise, we found that in most cases the decisions taken in recent years at the local level in our country have dealt with issues that demonstrate the connection of local councils and mayors to issues of greatest interest to the community: urban planning issues, environmental quality, air quality, support for disadvantaged and sensitive groups in society or issues related to the chances of involving young people in the community. In the last 20 years the public sector offered citizens the opportunity to be actively involved in the life of the city and in the decision-making process, which demonstrates the approach of the Romanian authorities to the European trend of transparency in the decision-making environment, but also the application of the principle of subsidiarity as a fundamental principle of the Romanian administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Mădălina-Elena MIHÄ‚ILESCU, 2023. "Public versus Political Decision in Administrative Space," Jurnalul de Studii Juridice, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics on Behalf of Petre Andrei University Iasi, vol. 18(3-4), pages 84-95, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:18:y:2022:i:3-4:p:84-95
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/jls/18.3-4/126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/jls/article/view/6822/4805
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/jls/18.3-4/126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:18:y:2022:i:3-4:p:84-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jls.upa.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.