IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev4rl/v17y2022i3-4p36-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

About Limits in Exercising the Active Role of the Judge* in Romanian Procedural Law

Author

Listed:
  • Mihai LUPU

    (Researcher, Romanian Academy, Iasi Branch, †Gh. Zane†Institute for Economic and Social Research)

Abstract

The active role of the judge, a fundamental principle of procedural law, is applied as varied as the personalities of the judges who administer justice are different. In relatively simple lawsuits, with a well-defined object and placed in a single demand end, the active role is limited to following a natural, predictable path. However, there are also situations in which the lawsuits have a complex object, with several claims, an object that does not, in fact, resolve the dispute, but will probably lead to another lawsuit. The tendency to emphasize formalism raises the issue of the ever- increasing limitation of the judge's role. In this paper I propose to outline some of these boundaries and possible situations in which the judge, exercising his active role by possibly expanding the procedural framework, resolves the dispute and prevents a new trial.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihai LUPU, 2022. "About Limits in Exercising the Active Role of the Judge* in Romanian Procedural Law," Jurnalul de Studii Juridice, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics on Behalf of Petre Andrei University Iasi, vol. 17(3-4), pages 36-47, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:17:y:2022:i:3-4:p:36-47
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/jls/17.3-4/109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/jls/article/view/6191/4323
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/jls/17.3-4/109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    litigation; judge; active role; limits.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I15 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Economic Development
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:17:y:2022:i:3-4:p:36-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jls.upa.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.