IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev3rl/v1y2010ip95-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pentru o dialectica a reprezentarii - For a Dialectic of Representation

Author

Listed:
  • Simona MARIES GRUIAN

    (Ph.D. Candidate)

Abstract

This study is a comparative analysis of the notion of literary representation from three different perspectives of the so-called “sacred monsters” of literary theory – W. Iser, A. Compagnon and P. Ricoeur. The focus of these pages is not a descriptive vision of the historical evolution of the term “representation”, but a comparative exercise of receptive synthesis. One of the defining traits of the study is pointing out the origins of term usage, fact that is considered useful in discovering the way the modern paradigm maintains the antic “model”. It is obvious that in time the notion became popular in the literary theory field and it developed a real polemic, which is why the historical perspective is proper while highlighting the development of such a notion of literary theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona MARIES GRUIAN, 2010. "Pentru o dialectica a reprezentarii - For a Dialectic of Representation," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 1, pages 95-110, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:1:y:2010:i::p:95-110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://postmodernopenings.com/archives/95
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    postmodernism; representation; imitation; semiosis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:1:y:2010:i::p:95-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.